Funding Pips vs The Funded Trader

Incorporation 🏁
Funding Pips
August 2022
The Funded Trader
May 2021
Pros ✅
Funding Pips
- Industry-leading low evaluation fees with a 4.7/5 Trustpilot rating. - Allocation capital up to $2,000,000 with 1:100 leverage. - Flexible trading: unlimited period, no minimum days, and scaling plans. - Profit sharing of 80% to 90% with weekly payouts. - Permissive trading: during news, overnight, and weekends.
The Funded Trader
- $600,000 standard balance, four funding options - 1:200 leverage with 80-90% profit splits - Stellar 4.7/5 Trustpilot from 5k reviews - Unlimited free evaluation retries - Scaling up to $1,500,000; overnight and news trading allowed - Comprehensive trading tools including forex and cryptocurrencies.
Cons ❌
Funding Pips
- No Live Chat Support (only email & Discord) - Mandatory stop-loss rule (on funded accounts)
The Funded Trader
- No free trial (as of now) - Customer support, while trustworthy, is slow - Trailing drawdown (in Knight's challenge)
Rules 📋
Funding Pips
Maximum Daily Loss, Maximum Loss, No Hedging Allowed, No Martingale Allowed, Profit Target, Stop Loss Required, Third Party Copy Trading Risk, Third Party EA Risk
The Funded Trader
Lot Size Limit, Maximum Daily Loss, Maximum Loss, Maximum Trading Days, Minimum Trading Days, No EAs Allowed, No Martingale Allowed, Profit Target, Third Party Copy Trading Risk
Deposit 🏧
Funding Pips
Crypto, Credit/debit cards
The Funded Trader
Credit/debit cards, Crypto
Withdrawal 💰
Funding Pips
Deel
The Funded Trader
Crypto, Deel
Account Size 🪙
Funding Pips
"$10,000 USD", "$100,000 USD", "$25,000 USD", "$5,000 USD", "$50,000 USD"
The Funded Trader
"$10,000 USD", "$100,000 USD", "$200,000 USD", "$25,000 USD", "$300,000 USD", "$400,000 USD", "$5,000 USD", "$50,000 USD"
Instruments 📈
Funding Pips
Commodities, Crypto, Forex, Indices, Metals
The Funded Trader
Commodities, Crypto, Forex, Indices
Currencies 💱
Funding Pips
USD
The Funded Trader
USD

Funding Pips: Low Barrier to Entry, High Potential Rewards

Retail traders in search of a prop firm with competitive evaluation fees need not look further than Funding Pips. The company catches the eye with its low-cost entry point for traders seeking to leverage their skills without breaking the bank. With a commendable Trustpilot rating, Funding Pips instills confidence in its clients. The capacity to handle capital of up to $2,000,000 and offering 1:100 leverage captures the attention of aggressive traders looking to scale up. Furthering its appeal is the absence of restrictive trading timelines, allowing traders to operate within a timeframe that aligns with their strategies. Profit sharing, swinging between 80% to 90%, paired with weekly payouts, resonates well with those looking to access their earnings promptly and efficiently. The allowance of trading during news hours, overnight, and on weekends can be a distinguishing factor for those favoring more flexible trading scenarios. However, the lack of live chat support could be a drawback for traders who seek instantaneous assistance. The mandatory stop-loss requirement might also be a point of contention for risk-takers who prefer a freer hand in position management.

The Funded Trader: Scaling and Resources for the Ambitious Trader

The Funded Trader steps up as a prop firm delivering various funding options, offering a standard balance of $600,000 and a generous 1:200 leverage. What truly separates this firm is the attractive profit split and the vast number of reviews that cement its reputation. With a significant emphasis on trader education and analytics through its comprehensive trading tools, The Funded Trader appeals to those keen on growth and continuous learning. The ability to trade a broad spectrum of instruments, including the volatile cryptocurrency market, adds an attractive dimension to the firm. While the firm does not offer a free trial, which can deter those looking for a test drive, it does provide unlimited evaluation retries, which underscores their support for trader development. However, the slow customer support response times could prove frustrating in fast-paced trading environments. The trailing drawdown in the Knight's challenge could be seen as a double-edged sword—encouraging discipline among traders while potentially curbing aggressive strategies.

Funding Availability and Financial Transactions

Both Funding Pips and The Funded Trader exhibit modernity in their deposit and withdrawal methods, embracing cryptocurrencies alongside traditional debit/credit card transactions. Notably, Funding Pips's exclusive partnership with Deel for withdrawals could signal streamlined financial operations, while The Funded Trader diversifies with additional crypto withdrawal options.

Comparing Trading Rules and Instruments

Funding Pips enforces a series of clear parameters such as the Maximum Daily Loss and a strict stop-loss requirement, which underscores their risk management focus. Conversely, The Funded Trader’s stipulations on lot size limits and a mix of minimum and maximum trading days introduce complexity, which might challenge or deter novice traders. The palette of tradeable instruments is rich for both firms, with a slight edge to Funding Pips that includes metals in its array. This diversity enables traders to diversify their tactics across multiple markets.

Corporate Standing and Growth

Despite being newer to the scene with its August 2022 incorporation, Funding Pips quickly establishes itself as a formidable contender in the prop trading space. The Funded Trader, with an inception date of May 2021, has already garnered extensive community feedback, suggesting a robust and actively engaged user base.

Closing Thoughts

Both Funding Pips and The Funded Trader stand out as reputable prop trading firms that cater to aggressive traders seeking substantial leverage and capital allocations. While Funding Pips excels with its relaxed approach to trading times and lower entry barriers, The Funded Trader provides ample scaling opportunities and comprehensive tools for serious traders. Prospective clients should consider their priorities—be it around support systems, flexibility, or educational resources—when making their choice.