- Developed for 2.5 years; Trustpilot rating of 4.7/5
- Owns ''GrowthNext Server''; up to $4,000,000 account balance
- Unlimited evaluation retries; balance-focused drawdown
- 15%-90% profit split; freedom in trading with 1:100 leverage
- Swap-free accounts; wide instrument selection
- Access to trading psychologists; no commission on indices.
TradingFunds
- Impressive Trustpilot rating of 4.3/5.
- Single-step evaluation with 1:10 to 1:100 leverage.
- Profit sharing of 80% to 90%.
- Flexible trading: overnight, weekends, and during news events.
- Unrestricted trading strategy.
Cons โ
FundedNext
- Minimum trading days requirement: 5
- No news trading for Express model accounts
- Consistency rule applied to Express model accounts
TradingFunds
- Elevated evaluation account fees
- Trailing Drawdown
- Starting leverage at a low of 1:10
- 2% Maximum stop-loss for each instrument
Rules ๐
FundedNext
Consistency Rule, Maximum Daily Loss, Maximum Loss, Maximum Trading Days, Minimum Trading Days, No News Trading, No Weekend Holding, Profit Target, Third Party Copy Trading Risk, Third Party EA Risk
TradingFunds
Maximum Trailing Drawdown, Profit Target, Stop Loss Required, Third Party Copy Trading Risk, Third Party EA Risk
Deposit ๐ง
FundedNext
Crypto, Credit/debit cards, Perfect Money, Bank Wire Transfer
FundedNext: A Robust and Versatile Proprietary Trading Firm
FundedNext emerges as a seasoned player in the proprietary trading space, boasting an impressive 4.7 out of 5 Trustpilot rating, which speaks volumes about client satisfaction and trust. Developed over 2.5 years, it reflects a mature offering with well-thought-out features tailored to support traders. Its own GrowthNext Server provides the means to scale up to a substantial $4,000,000 account balance, offering serious upside potential for successful traders.
One of the key strengths of FundedNext is the provision of unlimited evaluation retries, which aligns perfectly with the reality of trading โ a journey marked by learning and improvement. This, combined with a balance-focused drawdown, gives traders a fair shot at showing their skills without the pressure of passing a one-time test. Furthermore, the profit split is highly attractive, varying from 15% to a staggering 90% based on account type, which is one of the most competitive in the industry.
The firm offers a considerable amount of freedom to traders, allowing them to use up to 1:100 leverage, and caters to a broad audience with swap-free accounts and a wide instrument selection. Additional benefits like access to trading psychologists and zero commission on indices are notable perks that set this firm apart.
However, with advantages come certain constraints. Traders at FundedNext must adhere to a minimum trading days requirement and face restrictions on news trading for Express model accounts. Moreover, the consistency rule applied to Express model accounts could be a double-edged sword, promoting disciplined trading but also possibly constraining some trading styles.
TradingFunds: A New Challenger with Flexible Terms
Despite its recent inception in February 2023, TradingFunds makes a solid entry with an admirable Trustpilot rating of 4.3 out of 5. The simplified single-step evaluation process, which offers leverage ranging from 1:10 to 1:100, provides a straightforward path for traders to manage risk according to their confidence and strategy.
The profit-sharing arrangement is impressive, with traders taking home between 80% and 90% of profits. This margin is at the higher end of industry standards, undoubtedly a strong selling point for the firm. Additionally, TradingFunds does not restrict trading strategies, enabling trades overnight, on weekends, and during news events, which may appeal to a broad spectrum of traders who prefer not to miss any market opportunities.
However, potential users should be wary of the elevated evaluation account fees, which could be a hurdle for those with limited starting capital. The trailing drawdown might also be a concern for traders who have issues with managing floating losses. Lastly, the starting leverage is low, and the 2% maximum stop-loss per instrument might be seen as limiting by traders who prefer wider stop-loss strategies.
Comparing Account and Money Management Options
Both firms accept deposits via crypto and credit/debit cards, ensuring easy access for the majority of clients, with FundedNext additionally supporting bank wire transfers and Perfect Money. The withdrawal methods are similarly diverse and include some level of overlap, such as the inclusion of crypto and Deel among other options. Notably, PayPal's presence in TradingFunds as both a deposit and withdrawal method is a strong point due to its global popularity and ease of use.
As for account sizes, FundedNext has a variety of options including $100,000, $15,000, $200,000, $25,000, $50,000, and $6,000 USD, catering to a wide range of traders from beginners to more experienced individuals. On the other hand, TradingFunds seems to maintain an unspecified range of USD account sizes, potentially offering more flexibility or creating uncertainty around the initial investment required.
Instruments and Account Currencies
When it comes to tradeable instruments, both firms offer traders the opportunity to trade commodities, forex, and indices. TradingFunds edges forward slightly by adding crypto and metals to their list, which could be a significant draw for traders interested in these markets. Both firms use USD as the account currency, which is standard practice and provides consistency for most traders.
Final Thoughts
For retail traders and potential users making a decision between FundedNext and TradingFunds, the choice will come down to individual trading styles, risk preferences, and value placed on factors such as account scaling, profit splits, strategy freedom, and additional educational resources. FundedNext offers a mature platform with generous profit splits and educational support, but with certain trading restrictions. Meanwhile, TradingFunds, though newer and with potentially higher start-up costs, provides great flexibility and a trader-friendly profit split. Both firms demonstrate a commitment to their clients' success, with distinct approaches to how they structure their offerings.