- Three funding programs with up to 1:400 leverage
- Exceptional 4.3/5 Trustpilot; 95% profit split
- Unlimited free evaluation and redeposit for negative balances
- Overnight, weekend, and news trading; EA's/bots allowed
- Scaling option up to $3,200,000 (aggressive instant funding)
- Diverse trading tools: forex, commodities, indices, and cryptocurrencies.
Nations Trading
- Evaluation accounts up to $250,000
- Funding up to $1,000,000 per account
- Comprehensive trading instruments availability
- Permission for overnight and weekend position holding
- News trading is permissible
- Generous 80% profit sharing
Cons ❌
Finotive Funding
- 25% reduced profit split if RTP is violated after being funded
- No free trial
Nations Trading
- Insufficient community feedback
- Robot-assisted live chat
- Absence of a free trial
Rules 📋
Finotive Funding
Maximum Daily Loss, Maximum Loss, No Gambling Mentality, Profit Target, Third Party Copy Trading Risk
Nations Trading
Maximum Daily Loss, Maximum Loss, Maximum Trading Days, Minimum Trading Days, No Copy Trading Allowed, No EAs Allowed, Profit Target
Finotive Funding appears to be a well-rounded prop firm, appealing to traders who desire flexibility and high leverage. One of the most attractive features is the provision of three funding programs with up to a 1:400 leverage capacity. This would be particularly enticing for aggressive traders looking to maximize their potential returns. A commendable 4.3 out of 5 rating on Trustpilot indicates a strong customer satisfaction rate, enhancing its reputation among retail traders.
With a 95% profit split, Finotive Funding places itself among the highest echelons of trader-centric prop firms. The scaling option that reaches a formidable $3,200,000 provides a significant growth path for successful traders. Additionally, the allowance for expert advisors (EAs) and bots, alongside the unrestricted trading during news, overnight, and over the weekend, ensures that traders have room for implementing various strategies.
Nations Trading Overview
Nations Trading, while a younger contender in the prop firm space, brings competitive offerings to the table. Offering evaluation accounts up to an impressive $250,000 and possibilities of funding up to $1,000,000 per account, it caters well to serious traders looking to scale up quickly. Plus, the ability to trade a wide array of instruments, including stocks—a feature absent in Finotive Funding—increases its allure.
An 80% profit share is still quite generous, making Nations Trading an attractive option for traders who can forgo the highest splits in exchange for other benefits. Furthermore, the allowance for news trading and maintaining positions over the weekend and overnight positions it as a flexible option in terms of trading strategies.
Comparing Pros and Cons
Finotive Funding straddles the line between catering to aggressive growth and maintaining risk control. The reduced profit split if risk trading parameters (RTP) are violated might be seen as a stark downside—it places a significant onus on the trader to maintain a conservative profile. Nevertheless, traders have the opportunity to recover from setbacks with unlimited free evaluations and the option to redeposit for negative balances.
Nations Trading, while it offers an equally impressive suite of tools, falls short in building a robust community feedback loop—a crucial aspect for potential users to gauge trust and efficiency. The absence of a free trial may deter those who wish to test the waters before committing capital, similar to Finotive Funding's lack of a trial phase.
Rules and Restrictions
Trading comes with its own set of rules and limitations with both firms. Finotive Funding enforces a clear set of guidelines for trade management including maximum daily losses and profit targets, and it does not restrict third-party copy trading or the use of expert advisors. In contrast, Nations Trading's rules are a bit stricter—banning copy trading, EAs, and imposing both a maximum number of trading days and a requirement for minimum trading days.
Funding and Withdrawals
On the subject of financial transactions, both firms offer modern convenience with deposit methods including credit/debit cards and cryptocurrency. However, for withdrawals, Finotive Funding offers the more traditional bank wire along with Deel—a modern payments platform, potentially indicating more versatility in handling funds compared to Nations Trading's crypto-only withdrawal method.
Account Specifications
Retail traders thrive on options, and Finotive Funding offers a diverse selection of account sizes, from as low as $2,500 up to $200,000, with multiple options in between. It also supports trading with currencies like EUR, GBP, and USD. This palette of choices allows traders with various capital bases and strategies to find their fit. Nations Trading falls short on specifics regarding account sizes and currencies—offering transactions only in USD, which could limit the appeal to international traders.
Tradeable Instruments and Asset Diversity
Both firms offer a breadth of tradeable instruments including commodities, crypto, forex, indices, and metals. Nonetheless, Nations Trading edges ahead with the addition of stocks to its portfolio. This presents an opportunity for traders with a penchant for equity markets to dive in.
Corporate Longevity and Trust
Launched in April 2021, Finotive Funding has had more time to establish its presence and reputation in the trading world compared to Nations Trading, which started in June 2022. The infancy of Nations Trading is not necessarily a drawback, but it does underscore the need for it to build a track record and community backing to match its competitors.
Final Thoughts
Choosing between Finotive Funding and Nations Trading ultimately boils down to individual trader preferences and priorities. Finotive offers higher profit splits and aggressive scaling, but with higher scrutiny on risk management. Nations Trading, while young and less established, presents solid funding opportunities and requires a sturdier adherence to its trading rules. Traders must weigh the importance of community feedback, flexibility in trading strategies, and the availability of diverse assets against profit sharing and growth potential when selecting the prop firm that best suits their trading style and goals.