E8 Funding vs Finotive Funding

Incorporation 🏁
E8 Funding
November 2021
Finotive Funding
April 2021
Pros ✅
E8 Funding
- 4.7/5 Trustpilot rating with Free Trial and unlimited retries - $1,000,000 max on ELEV8; 80% Profit share; bi-weekly payouts - Overnight/weekend holding, news trading, and scaling option - 1:100 Leverage with balance-based drawdown - Broad range of trading instruments; No min. trading day requirements.
Finotive Funding
- Three funding programs with up to 1:400 leverage - Exceptional 4.3/5 Trustpilot; 95% profit split - Unlimited free evaluation and redeposit for negative balances - Overnight, weekend, and news trading; EA's/bots allowed - Scaling option up to $3,200,000 (aggressive instant funding) - Diverse trading tools: forex, commodities, indices, and cryptocurrencies.
Cons ❌
E8 Funding
- 5% Max daily drawdown - Slippage issues - High commission costs
Finotive Funding
- 25% reduced profit split if RTP is violated after being funded - No free trial
Rules 📋
E8 Funding
Maximum Daily Loss, Maximum Loss, Maximum Trading Days, Minimum Trading Days, Profit Target, Third Party Copy Trading Risk, Third Party EA Risk
Finotive Funding
Maximum Daily Loss, Maximum Loss, No Gambling Mentality, Profit Target, Third Party Copy Trading Risk
Deposit 🏧
E8 Funding
Credit/debit cards, Crypto
Finotive Funding
Credit/debit cards, Crypto
Withdrawal 💰
E8 Funding
Deel
Finotive Funding
Bank Wire Transfer, Deel
Account Size 🪙
E8 Funding
"$100,000 USD", "$25,000 USD", "$250,000 USD", "$50,000 USD"
Finotive Funding
"$10,000 USD", "$100,000 USD", "$2,500 USD", "$200,000 USD", "$25,000 USD", "$5,000 USD", "$50,000 USD"
Instruments 📈
E8 Funding
Commodities, Crypto, Forex, Indices, Metals
Finotive Funding
Commodities, Crypto, Forex, Indices, Metals
Currencies 💱
E8 Funding
EUR, GBP, USD
Finotive Funding
EUR, GBP, USD

Overview of E8 Funding

E8 Funding is an emerging player in the proprietary trading firm arena, attracting retail traders with its admirable 4.7/5 Trustpilot rating. One standout advantage is the provision of a Free Trial, coupled with unlimited retries, which lowers the barrier for entry and attracts traders keen on testing their strategies without financial risk. E8 Funding's $1,000,000 maximum on the ELEV8 program and an 80% profit share with bi-weekly payouts make it highly competitive. The leverage of 1:100 paired with balance-based drawdown, and the lack of minimum trading day requirements, provide a considerable amount of flexibility, thereby catering to both aggressive and conservative trading styles. Moreover, E8 allows for overnight/weekend holding and news trading, along with the potential for account scaling, which paves the way for growth and expansion for successful traders.

E8 Funding Limitations

Despite its many benefits, E8 Funding is not without its cons. A 5% maximum daily drawdown can be quite constraining to traders who employ high-volatility strategies. Slippage issues have also been pointed out, which may affect entry and exit points, potentially harming trading outcomes. Additionally, higher commission costs could erode the profit margins of traders, especially those who engage in high-frequency trading.

Analysis of Finotive Funding

Finotive Funding presents an alternative that embodies flexibility, offering three distinct funding programs with leverage going as high as 1:400. It boasts an excellent 4.3/5 Trustpilot score and shines with an impressive 95% profit split, which is among the highest in the industry. The feature of unlimited free evaluation and redeposit for negative balances indicates a commitment to nurturing traders without the fear of permanent loss. Finotive's allowance for overnight, weekend, and news trading, alongside the usage of EAs/bots, caters to a wide range of trading styles. The scaling option up to a striking $3,200,000 through aggressive instant funding demonstrates Finotive Funding's support for trader advancement.

Finotive Funding Drawbacks

A downside to Finotive Funding is the potential 25% reduction in profit split if traders violate the Risk Trading Policy (RTP) after being funded. This may deter traders who are risk-averse or those not fully confident in their risk management practices. Also, unlike E8 Funding, Finotive does not offer a free trial, which could be a disadvantage for traders seeking a no-cost entry point.

Trading Rules and Restrictions

Both prop firms impose rules including maximum daily loss limits, maximum total loss restrictions, and profit targets, which are standard across the industry. E8 Funding includes additional rules such as maximum and minimum trading days and restrictions on third-party copy trading and EA risk. Finotive Funding is less restrictive in these aspects but emphasizes a no gambling mentality, which suggests a focus on sustainable and disciplined trading practices.

Transaction Methods and Accessibility

Transaction ease is of utmost importance. Both E8 Funding and Finotive Funding accept deposits through credit/debit cards and cryptocurrency, indicating their modern approach to financing. However, withdrawal options are slightly different, with Finotive Funding offering the traditional bank wire transfer in addition to the Deel platform, whereas E8 provides payouts exclusively through Deel.

Account Options and Tradable Instruments

Both firms offer a similar array of tradable instruments, including commodities, crypto, forex, indices, and metals, ensuring that traders have a broad market scope. Account currency options are equal as well, with both offering accounts in EUR, GBP, and USD. Account size options are varied, with E8 Funding presenting a range from $25,000 to $1,000,000, while Finotive's aggressive instant funding covers an expansive range up to $3,200,000.

Final Comparison

To summarize, E8 Funding and Finotive Funding are both competitive prop firms, each with unique strengths. E8's robust support system, flexible terms, and leverage offer a strong platform for traders who can stomach the daily drawdown limits and higher commissions. On the other hand, Finotive’s exceptionally high profit split and vast scaling potential might attract aggressive traders looking for growth opportunities, albeit at the potential cost of a strict RTP adherence. Ultimately, the choice between the two will hinge on the individual trader’s preference for trial offerings, risk tolerance, potential growth, trading conditions, and transaction convenience.