- Access to capital as much as $1,024,000
- Regular bi-weekly disbursements
- Both overnight and weekend holdings permitted
- Trading during news events sanctioned
- Comprehensive trading strategies embraced (e.g., EA’s, indicators, hedging, copy trading, etc.)
- Broad spectrum of trading tools available (inclusive of all forex pairs, commodities, and indices)
Funding Pips
- Industry-leading low evaluation fees with a 4.7/5 Trustpilot rating.
- Allocation capital up to $2,000,000 with 1:100 leverage.
- Flexible trading: unlimited period, no minimum days, and scaling plans.
- Profit sharing of 80% to 90% with weekly payouts.
- Permissive trading: during news, overnight, and weekends.
Cons ❌
BuoyTrade
- Leverage restricted to 1:20
- Absence of a complimentary trial
Funding Pips
- No Live Chat Support (only email & Discord)
- Mandatory stop-loss rule (on funded accounts)
Rules 📋
BuoyTrade
Maximum Loss, Minimum Trading Days, Profit Target
Funding Pips
Maximum Daily Loss, Maximum Loss, No Hedging Allowed, No Martingale Allowed, Profit Target, Stop Loss Required, Third Party Copy Trading Risk, Third Party EA Risk
BuoyTrade distinguishes itself by offering traders access to substantial capital, with the possibility of controlling a portfolio as large as $1,024,000. One feature that sets BuoyTrade apart is the bi-weekly disbursements, which allow traders to receive payouts more frequently than is standard in the industry. This could be particularly appealing to traders who rely on regular income from their trading activities. The company's willingness to embrace a comprehensive range of trading strategies, including the use of expert advisors (EAs), indicators, hedging, and copy trading, speaks to its progressive nature—granting traders the freedom to operate in a manner that aligns with their unique strategies and preferences.
Funding Pips Snapshot
Funding Pips is lauded for its exceptionally low evaluation fees, which have garnered a high Trustpilot rating, suggesting a strong reputation within the trading community. The impressive capital allocation that can reach up to $2,000,000 with a generous 1:100 leverage can be particularly attractive for ambitious traders looking to scale their operations. The flexibility in trading terms and the lack of restrictions on trading duration and minimum days contribute to a liberating trading environment. Furthermore, the profit sharing of 80% to 90% with weekly payouts is competitive, potentially offering traders a larger piece of their earnings much quicker compared to industry norms.
Comparing Trading Conditions
While both BuoyTrade and Funding Pips boast permissive trading conditions such as allowing positions to be held overnight and during weekends, and during news events, the differences in their approach to trading restrictions is noteworthy. BuoyTrade shows a more lenient approach concerning trading strategies, as they support various trading methods including the use of EAs and copy trading. Conversely, Funding Pips implements stricter rules by prohibiting certain strategies like hedging and Martingale, potentially affecting traders who specialize or prefer these methods.
Financial Transactions and Accessibility
In terms of the platforms' financial infrastructure, both firms offer similar deposit methods, accepting crypto and credit/debit cards. However, withdrawal methods diverge: BuoyTrade provides more conventional avenues like bank wire transfers and PayPal, while Funding Pips uses Deel—a global payroll and compliance service. This difference might influence traders' preference based on the availability and convenience related to their personal banking systems.
Toolkits and Asset Comparison
With respect to tradeable instruments, BuoyTrade offers a focused selection including all forex pairs, commodities, and indices. In comparison, Funding Pips extends its offerings to include cryptos and metals, alongside other assets. This broader selection may appeal to traders with diverse investment interests and those looking to take advantage of the extensive opportunities within the crypto and metals markets.
Structure and Scale
Both firms offer numerous account sizes with various capital allocations, catering to traders of different scales and investment levels. While BuoyTrade was established in February 2021, Funding Pips entered the scene later, in August 2022. Despite its newer standing, Funding Pips seems to compete strongly, especially with its capacity to provide higher leveraged capital.
Support and User Experience
A point of critique for Funding Pips is the absence of live chat support, offering only email and Discord channels for assistance. Lack of immediate support can be a drawback for traders seeking quick resolutions. In addition, the mandatory stop-loss rule on funded accounts at Funding Pips is a controversial policy that may limit traders' risk management strategies but also serves to protect the firm’s capital.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the choice between BuoyTrade and Funding Pips will depend on individual trader priorities. For those who value higher access to capital, progressive trading conditions, and the need for frequent payouts, BuoyTrade presents a compelling option. On the other hand, traders who prioritize low evaluation costs, the potential for high profits, and a diverse range of tradeable assets may gravitate towards Funding Pips. It is essential for traders to weigh these considerations against their personal trading style and risk tolerance to select the prop firm that aligns best with their goals and preferences.