- Access to capital as much as $1,024,000
- Regular bi-weekly disbursements
- Both overnight and weekend holdings permitted
- Trading during news events sanctioned
- Comprehensive trading strategies embraced (e.g., EA’s, indicators, hedging, copy trading, etc.)
- Broad spectrum of trading tools available (inclusive of all forex pairs, commodities, and indices)
Finotive Funding
- Three funding programs with up to 1:400 leverage
- Exceptional 4.3/5 Trustpilot; 95% profit split
- Unlimited free evaluation and redeposit for negative balances
- Overnight, weekend, and news trading; EA's/bots allowed
- Scaling option up to $3,200,000 (aggressive instant funding)
- Diverse trading tools: forex, commodities, indices, and cryptocurrencies.
Cons ❌
BuoyTrade
- Leverage restricted to 1:20
- Absence of a complimentary trial
Finotive Funding
- 25% reduced profit split if RTP is violated after being funded
- No free trial
Rules 📋
BuoyTrade
Maximum Loss, Minimum Trading Days, Profit Target
Finotive Funding
Maximum Daily Loss, Maximum Loss, No Gambling Mentality, Profit Target, Third Party Copy Trading Risk
BuoyTrade and Finotive Funding offer retail traders significant capital for trading activities, with BuoyTrade providing access to as much as $1,024,000 and Finotive Funding scaling up to $3,200,000. While BuoyTrade's upper limit is lower, its bi-weekly disbursements could appeal to traders looking for regular payouts. In contrast, Finotive Funding's high leverage of 1:400 and an impressive 95% profit split – which can be reduced to 70% if certain rules are violated – might attract those seeking a greater reward for their successful trades.
Trading Flexibility and Tools
Both firms permit trading during news events, overnight, and on weekends, granting traders the flexibility to capitalize on market opportunities around the clock. BuoyTrade and Finotive Funding are also open to various trading strategies, including the use of Expert Advisors (EAs), bots, and hedging. In terms of instruments, Finotive Funding takes the lead by including cryptocurrencies, which may be attractive to traders looking to diversify their portfolio beyond traditional forex pairs, commodities, and indices offered by both firms.
Risk and Money Management Rules
Each firm sets specific parameters to manage risk, such as maximum loss and profit targets. BuoyTrade’s rules include maximum loss and a minimum number of trading days, while Finotive Funding additionally imposes maximum daily loss limitations and distinct guidelines to prevent a 'gambling mentality', which speaks to their focus on promoting disciplined trading. Moreover, Finotive Funding has specific rules against third-party copy trading risk, which could either be seen as an attempt to maintain quality control or as a potential limitation for traders who rely on such strategies.
Funding and Withdrawals
Options for account funding and profit withdrawals are crucial for traders; both firms accept crypto and credit/debit cards for deposits, signaling an understanding of modern payment preferences. However, BuoyTrade might stand out to traders who prefer PayPal for withdrawals, while Finotive Funding offers an alternative through Deel, an international payroll solution.
Support and Infrastructure
The online reputation and support infrastructure of a prop firm can be indicative of its reliability and trader focus. Finotive Funding’s high Trustpilot rating of 4.3/5 suggests a strong level of trader satisfaction and trust. This could prove reassuring to new traders assessing the credibility of a prop firm.
Final Considerations and Unique Perspectives
Deciding between BuoyTrade and Finotive Funding will largely depend on the individual trader’s objectives, trading style, and risk management preferences. BuoyTrade’s allure lies in its endorsement of comprehensive trading strategies and a broad selection of trading tools, coupled with its bi-weekly disbursements. On the other hand, Finotive Funding’s potential for higher leverage, its robust scaling option, and varied instrument offerings, including cryptocurrencies, could attract more adventurous traders looking for growth and variety.
It is notable, however, that the reduction in profit splits with Finotive Funding upon violating rules post-funding is an aspect that traders must carefully consider, as it directly affects profitability. The lack of a free trial option also means that traders have to commit financially from the outset.
Both BuoyTrade and Finotive Funding cater to the high aspirations of retail traders but in different ways. The ultimate choice will depend on balancing these firms' unique offerings with one's trading discipline and financial goals.